From the incredible AutoAdmit case:Bartow believes the problem lies in technology outstripping the law and our cultural responses.
Um, yes. Unquestionably, especially our cultural responses.
Or, as Jeff Goldblum once argued in Jurassic Park: "We were so busy worrying about whether or not we could, we never stopped to think whether or not we should."
Or, as an instructor of mine once argued in a debate about whether or not cloning was ethical: What we think is ethical or not doesn't matter, as someone, somewhere, is going to do it anyway, and what's important is not our approval or disapproval, but having a coherent, comprehensive response.
I think the latter holds true here.
Habermas, of course, would probably categorize this as a byproduct of the colonization of the lifeworld (if that goes over your head.... don't worry about it).
Friday, August 1, 2008
Add one pinch of Habermas to taste
Posted by Dennis at 2:18 PM
Labels: amateur philosophy, ethics, sexism, the law
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment